2020 as F1’s most expensive year yet

1
Photo by: www.kymillman.com/f1

In Formula 1, there are always strings attached. Each decision seeks an intended outcome and despite if you achieve that outcome or not, there are always varying levels of indirect impact that sometimes wasn’t foreseen or desired.

The most recent case is the proposed 2021 regulation changes. These included new aerodynamic parameters to allow cars to race closely to each other, new tire/wheel sizes and a cost cap (which is more like a resource restriction agreement of old).

For sake of argument let’s assume that everyone is elated with the changes. Let us also assume that the changes will deliver their intended results. The knock-on effect? Red Bull’s Christian Horner explains:

“You have an unrestricted and uncontrolled amount of money that you can spend on research and development across other areas,” said Horner. “For me, I stand by what I said previously.

“It would have been better to have introduced the cap first and then the regulations a year down the line, because then the budget cap would have constrained the amount of spend.

“Next year looks to be our most expensive ever year in F1.”

What you have is unlimited budgets to build the car of 2021 so all that will be required is a new restricted or capped budget to maintain the car. If teams had to design and build their 2021 car under the weight of a cost cap, things may be quite different and the smaller teams may be able to compete but as it is, Mercedes will have a design more bullet proof to see them through the 2021 era of regulations whereas Racing Point may not. Horner continued:

“Now the 2021 regulations are clear, we have an advanced team starting to investigate those regulations,” he said.

“It makes it an incredibly expensive year because we are developing under two types of regs and before the new financial cap comes in as well.

“So 2020 will be an expensive and busy year, certainly off track and on track.”

I have to assume F1’s Ross Brawn thought about this adverse situation and knew that changing the regulations may be good for the sport but if teams have a development year for those new cars with unlimited budgets, the product they put on the grid in 2021 may have baked-in performance disparities due to the amount of resources big teams could bring to the equation.

HAt Tip: Autosport

1
Leave a Reply

simple-ad

This is a demo advert, you can use simple text, HTML image or any Ad Service JavaScript code. If you're inserting HTML or JS code make sure editor is switched to "Text" mode.

avatar
  
smilegrinwinkmrgreenneutraltwistedarrowshockunamusedcooleviloopsrazzrollcryeeklolmadsadexclamationquestionideahmmbegwhewchucklesillyenvyshutmouth
Photo and Image Files
 
 
 
Audio and Video Files
 
 
 
Other File Types
 
 
 
1 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
1 Comment authors
The Captain Recent comment authors

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
The Captain
Member
Member
The Captain
Offline

“I have to assume F1’s Ross Brawn thought about this”

I also assume Brawn (or someone) would have thought about this. So I guess the real question is why and by who’s demand did the FIA negotiate that away? Imma gonna guess RB was on the ‘demand’ side too. I mean If I had Newey and new aero regs, he’d have a as much money as he want’s for him and a department, the most overworked interns, all the paper and pens he’s needed, and a boat division to play with on the weekend.