Drivers defending DRS…or at least missing it in Abu Dhabi

4

The Abu Dhabi Grand Pix was marred by a server issue that prevented the DRS electronics system from operating for 16 or so laps into the race. During that time, drivers were forced to be creative in their passing attempts and detractors of DRS—full disclosure that I am one of them—were happy to see legitimate set ups and passes in creative locations as well as using the slipstream to full effect.

Other folks weren’t so happy and that includes a few drivers that Autosport quoted in support of DRS. I do find it interesting to see a full-throated support article of DRS after the grand prix with the likes of Ricciardo, Sainz and Bottas.

“It made it even more boring!, said Renault’s Daniel Ricciardo.

“You need it on some tracks, for sure, and this is one of them. Tracks like Monza and that, you could get away without it, but I think it’s a great thing.

“I’m sure some people will say it’s a bit artificial, but we need it, especially with these cars with the speeds we are going, otherwise there’s no overtaking.

“So god bless DRS.”

I understand Dan’s point that passing is assisted on track such as Abu Dhabi as it was this track that begat the DRS in the first place. I also appreciated watching Bottas set up his passes and work to make them happen instead of just waiting for them to happen. There is a stark difference between making it and waiting for it. Bottas knows this.

“I was really eager to get closer to the podium and closer to the front, so it was annoying not to have it,” Valtteri Bottas said.

“In my position, attacking and having the pace, we wanted to have it, but obviously the cars that were defending, I think they were happy to not have it. So this is a tricky one.

“I think with the current cars we have in F1 it is a good thing.

“But hopefully in the future in 2021, maybe we can get rid of it.”

In short, no one wants a processional race and DRS is, for lack of a better analogy, a mask that hides a greater evil in F1 in the form of aerodynamics run amok. The current cars are designed to make turbulent air behind and in doing so, make it hard to follow.

I understand the need for DRS now but like Bottas, I am hoping the 2021 regulations will deliver a chassis that doesn’t need DRS or any artificial constructs to actually race.

Hat Tip: Autosport

4
Leave a Reply

simple-ad

This is a demo advert, you can use simple text, HTML image or any Ad Service JavaScript code. If you're inserting HTML or JS code make sure editor is switched to "Text" mode.

avatar
  
smilegrinwinkmrgreenneutraltwistedarrowshockunamusedcooleviloopsrazzrollcryeeklolmadsadexclamationquestionideahmmbegwhewchucklesillyenvyshutmouth
Photo and Image Files
 
 
 
Audio and Video Files
 
 
 
Other File Types
 
 
 
2 Comment threads
2 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
3 Comment authors
adouglas2001Negative CamberXean45 Recent comment authors

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Xean45
Member
Member
Xean45
Offline

I personally love DRS. Saying it’s artificial is akin to saying that using KERS, or even using a low aero configuration to go faster on straights is artificial. All drivers have DRS. All drivers use it. It’s one of the few things in F1 that’s pretty much the same across the board. It allows equal drivers/cars to have great back and forth, and gets a slower team to tussle with a slightly quicker team. But if they do get rid of DRS, then please also get rid of Tire Blankets!

adouglas2001
Member
adouglas2001
Offline

Todd…. *tap* *tap* is this thing on? Steering wheel! COME ON!