Eurocare livid over Heineken F1 deal

12

The Heineken sponsorship of Formula 1 was met with applause and the big party over the Canadian Grand Prix weekend was praised by most of the press who attended as a stand-out event. The European Alcohol Policy Alliance (Eurocare) doesn’t care about that or any parties or how Heineken is going to wake F1 boss Bernie Ecclestone up to digital media. No, they wrote a scathing letter to FIA president Jean Todt.

According to AUTOSPORT, Eurocare’s secretary general Mariann Skar wrote Todt and said:

“Alcohol marketing has a powerful effect on society, in particular on young people.

“F1 is close to becoming more an event for granting the global exposure of alcohol brands than a sporting event.

“It is … worrying that F1 is now bringing the link between alcohol brands and motorsport even closer together.”

When tobacco advertising was banned by the EU, it sucked massive sponsor dollars out of Formula 1 and many believed the tech sector would fill this gap being that this is, after all, a high tech racing series. That didn’t happen at a level to replace tobacco money. Slowly, alcohol became more pervasive in its sponsorship of teams and now the entire sport manifest in the Heineken deal. Skar even offered some metrics regarding her concern:

‘If you drive never drink’ campaign, has simply exacerbated a problem she is trying to eradicate.

“F1 should ask themselves if they want to be a motorsport or an alcohol brand event?” she wrote.

“When monitoring F1 in Monaco Grand Prix 2015, we found 11 references to alcohol brands per minute, averaging one reference every five seconds.

“How will it be when Heineken comes in as main sponsor in addition to the others?

“If both the sport and the drinks producers want to be seen as responsible industries, they should stop this deal and move away from alcohol sponsorship in F1.”

Certainly there are those who feel promoting something that has been shown to be abused and harmful or fatal is not a good idea. There are those who feel that society at large cannot avoid the bigger issue of personal accountability and responsibility. Depending on which side of that argument you land, you may find Skar’s letter a welcome effort to stop alcohol from being promoted by F! or you may find this yet another attack on F1 or its sponsors.

Skar feels the FIA are on the hook for this as well saying:

“We would like to request that you take this issue seriously and consider moving away from these sponsorship agreements, as you did with tobacco sponsorship.

“FIA is not without responsibilities, being the governing body of F1 and also being one of the shareholders in the sport.”

I would like to see the metrics on how many millions of lives were saved or how many billions in healthcare costs were saved by banning tobacco advertising in F1. With all of those presumed billions saved, where did that money go and what was it used for? What is the net positive effect of the tobacco ban on F1 advertising?

If you amass metrics to show exposure to a brand and suggest correlation equals causation in the aspect of tobacco or now alcohol, then where is the post-mortem net positive metrics that show these actions are, indeed, the correct decision beyond just feeling better. We banned tobacco and alcohol advertising in the US some time ago but not beer, just the liquor. We have since changed that and now Jack Daniels can advertise along with other beer and alcohol companies. I haven’t seen the data behind the lift of the ban but it is an interesting conversation nonetheless. We still don’t advertise tobacco.

Hat Tip: AUTOSPORT

12
Leave a Reply

avatar
 
Photo and Image Files
 
 
 
Audio and Video Files
 
 
 
Other File Types
 
 
 
11 Comment threads
1 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
11 Comment authors
Joe MamaMeine PostmaTom FirthPaul KieferJr Recent comment authors

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
worldwidewilli
Guest
worldwidewilli

Yet another reason the demise of the EU and its rule of every aspect of life by faceless, unelected bureaucrats cannot come fast enough. This is utterly ridiculous.

GaryK
Guest
GaryK

Aside from counting “11 references to alcohol brands per minute” at one grand prix I saw absolutely no “metrics” from Mariann Skar–just opinions and speculation. Drinkers gonna drink. How is F1 brand exposure is going to actually cause a person to drink more than they would have with no exposure. Maybe more of a given brand, I suppose.

Dannie Belluci
Guest
Dannie Belluci

If F1 wants to promote a road safety about Drink Driving Campaign, then Alcahol shouldn’t be promoted

deadbroke
Guest
deadbroke

Seriously, getting out of your racecar after an intense stint with the adrenaline still flowing, ripping the sweat drenched helmet off your head and lighting up a sweet, sweet cigarette… There’s nothing like it…. stupid negative health effects. Why is everything so good so bad?

Peter Riva
Member
Peter Riva

Beer is food. Originally made to prevent grain from spoiling, beer’s calorific value is based on food. Aren’t we past prohibition yet?
Now, if they had a marijuana sponsor, F1 would be fine. And I say why the hell not?

mini696
Member

Their comments mean nothing to me while it is legal to do so.

Rapierman
Member
Rapierman

Hello, EU? Yeah, we tried that “prohibition” thing here in the USA. Guess how that went. :P

meine
Member
meine

Same goes for making other drugs illegal. Just stimulates criminality.

Tom Firth
Guest
Tom Firth

Ok, lets actually look at this – Press release that the Quotes are from – Reaction to F1 and its Heineken sponsorship deal. Today Eurocare issued an open letter addressed to Jean Todt, the President of Federation Internationale de l’Automobile, with a Reaction to F1 and its Heineken sponsorship deal. Heineken recently launched their new sponsorship agreements with F1, a five-year deal estimated to be worth $150 m. With this new deal, Heineken will place themselves as one of the main sponsors of the sport, with both trackside billboards, branded name of the events and other promotional activities. Alcohol brands… Read more »

meine
Member
meine

Euro-who?-cares.

Heerlijk Helder Heineken.

Member
Dr T

I can put ethanol in my car but not tobacco – so the sponsorship makes sense to me…

There is no safe level of tobacco – there is at least no long term detriment to the consumption of alcohol within moderation…

Joe Mama
Guest
Joe Mama

One has to wonder, if the association between drink and racing is indeed a motivation for consumers to combine the two, surely it’s Heineken that’s getting screwed here. Statistically, drinking on its own is far safer than driving. Rare indeed is the fatal drinking accident without transportation involved.

In light of this reality, if F1 is serious about being socially responsible, they will immediately shift the focus of their air time to communicating the pleasure and goodness of drink, and do away forthwith any mention or imagery of driving.

It’s the truly responsible thing to do.