Next week, the residents of Scotland vote on whether Scotland should become an independent country. While this will have no bearing on Formula 1 as far as I can tell, it may affect the way statistics are shown in terms of individual nation’s success in the sport. In terms of both race wins and driver’s championships the United Kingdom tops both tables.


The USA figure includes the ten times that the Indianapolis 500 was included in the world championship in the 1950s (when none of the regular F1 teams entered, so the race was won by local drivers).


However if we take into account the relative population of the countries involved, the tables can look different.


With the race wins per million of population looking like this:


And the driver’s championships won per million of population like this:


Here we can see that the relatively small population of Finland, Austria and New Zealand has moved them up the tables, while the large populations in Brazil, Germany and USA have demoted them.
Should Scotland vote for independence, it would divide the UK figures into those for Scotland (65 wins and 5 driver’s championships) Rest of UK (165 wins and 9 driver’s championships). With a population of only 5.3 million people (leaving 58.7 million in the rest of UK) the tables look different.

The overall wins per country still has the Rest of UK on the top, but Scotland is now in fifth place.


It is in joint fourth place for the number of driver’s titles.


But when the small size of the population is considered, it beats even Finland into second place in both tables.




Some countries have a small number of truly world class drivers (Spain with Alonso), others have had a large number of race winners, but only one truly successful driver (France, with fifteen drivers who won at least one race, but only Prost who won the championship, but he did that four times).



High numbers of winning drivers from nations that have been involved in Formula 1 for virtually the whole of its history (Italy, France and the UK) are probably in direct proportion to the number of drivers who entered the sport. The figure for the USA is high again because of the inclusion of the results from the Indianapolis 500 race in the first decade of the championship. What is surprising is how few of the drivers from France and Italy who had the talent to win a race but not the opportunity to win a championship. In most of the other nations about half of the drivers who won a race managed to win a championship. South Africa and Spain have perfect records in that their only drivers to win a race also won the title, while Austria and Scotland again have a better than 50% strike rate.

So, what is it about these sparsely populated cold countries that makes them so good at driving? After all it is not just in F1 that both Scotland and Finland have enviable records. The results in Rallying re also top class. Let me know your thoughts in the comments below.

Leave a Reply

Photo and Image Files
Audio and Video Files
Other File Types
4 Comment threads
2 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
5 Comment authors
CodyMIENegative CamberJackie Conneryjeff Recent comment authors

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

newest oldest most voted
Notify of

Very interesting article that I missed. Was this not on the banner head?

I’ve read the various Nordic countries impart very difficult driver’s tests on their inhabitants; anticipatory driving, car control are tested, which makes sense considering the challenging climate. It’s why I bet those in Chicago are fantastic snow drivers, whilst I poop kittens when there’s a little dusting of snow en route to Tahoe.

Scotland’s a curious one; big car culture there, a demanding license test? Boredom?

Jackie Connery
Jackie Connery

Absolutely irrelevant as it’s so retrospective.If Scotland had remained independent over the last 307yrs do you think the likes of Stewart, Clark, Coulthard etc would have had the opportunity to become F1 drivers. The first thing most successes in sport and business (not to mention show business Connery, Stewart) is leave Scotland. And rightfully so. It offers little as part of the UK and nothing as an independent. And yes, I am Scottish although live in a much more preferable country although that information doesn’t narrow it down much.

Negative Camber
Negative Camber

Hmmm…the book “how the Scots invented the modern world” must not be collecting dust on your shelf. ;)


Can you explain how their opportunities would have been unattainable had Scotland been independent.

Jackie Connery
Jackie Connery

It’s a fair statistical exercise I guess and for the statisticians amongst we know of course that we can make the numbers mean what we want them to mean. With regards to other sports I always wondered why the Italians and Spanish produced so many top motorcyclists. You can crunch as many numbers as you like but a brief holiday to either country will provide a clear answer. Similarly in Northern Ireland which is and always has been a hotbed for TT racers. Lawless roads make for excellent breeding grounds. I suspect that there is alos a high incidence of… Read more »