There may have been six winners from six races this year, yet one name in particular stands out as an absentee. Lewis Hamilton is in an ultra-rare class of driver, having won at least one race in every F1 season he has competed in. That may even be a class of one.***

It also represents a level of consistency comparable with his as yet winless 2012 season, where Hamilton has not yet finished lower than 8th – something nobody else in the field can claim. And that’s even with a few pretty chunky hiccups along the way. He’s also by far the best qualifier in the field in 2012 to date, as discussed here.

Yet even his biggest fans would surely concur that Hamilton’s career has been marked by peaks and troughs, perhaps more than most? As brilliant as he is at his best, there have been more than a few races where he has made his own life tricky in the past.

The Gilles Villeneuve circuit in Montreal is the track that most consistently reveals all the extremes of Lewis Hamilton.

In 2007, Hamilton arrived for the first time ever, again riding a wave of consistency. Driving that, erm, contentious but undeniably brilliant MP4-22 (Spygate, anyone?), Hamilton had five podiums from five career starts going into the Canadian Grand Prix. He put the car on pole, then he won for the first time in his short F1 tenure. Hamilton took the lead in the title hunt for the first time too with the 10 points scored. He also doubled his money seven days later at Indianapolis, and the rest of that turbulent debut season – as they say – is history. (Incidentally, if you unify the scoring systems, 2007 remains Lewis’ best ever in terms of points scored.)

Hamilton’s 2008 showing in Montreal is history too, but for very different reasons. The race made my top five of the past five years on our special anniversary podcast in part for those images in the pit lane. That red light, the stationary red car, and the silver arrow piercing it. Whoops, indeed. Heartfelt apologies, Kimi Raikkonen – hadn’t realised you had stopped there. For any who weren’t watching, Lewis retired when fighting for the lead, hitting Kimi Raikkonen at a red light at the end of the pit lane – present due to the safety car that had caused the leaders to box. To be fair, Nico Rosberg did exactly the same thing and squirmed into the McLaren’s rear end in a Williams.

2009 is a candidate for worst year of the century to date; there was no Canadian Grand Prix.

Sanity prevailed in 2010 and F1 went back to invariably one of the best-attended motor races in the entire world, in any category. (Seriously, I think that after Spa, Montreal probably tops my “I implore you, Mr Ecclestone, just please don’t touch it” list. That or Suzuka, but the racing’s better at Montreal usually.)

The return was great for Lewis, too. He qualified on pole and looked favourite for much of the race, despite a bold attempt at a one-stopper from Mark Webber – who led for a long but doomed period. Ultimately Hamilton controlled the race from pole and won, textbook. Jenson Button rolled in second to complete a grand day at the office for the lads from Woking. With that win, Hamilton took the lead in the championship race.

2011’s rain-delayed Canadian Grand Prix, the longest in history if memory serves, was a little shorter for Lewis than the others. Hamilton and Webber collided at the slippery start, costing Webber dearly and Hamilton a little, at the first corner. Six laps in, Hamilton and Button came together on the start-finish line with Hamilton seeking to slide down on the pit-wall side. The pair clashed, Hamilton hit the wall and was forced to retire with major damage, Button went on to drop as low as 18th but eventually come back to win – even after that somewhat critical radio message in the early running.

So there we go, I give you the hit-and-miss tale of Lewis Hamilton in Canada. Could he be due another hit? That “one win in every season” record (is it a record?***) is still theoretically under threat, after all. But do any of us really expect it to fall? It could be preserved within a week.

***I checked Jim Clark, he didn’t get there. Fangio would have but for his swansong season. Vettel has won a race in every FULL season, including this one, but there’s the back half of 2007 to consider. All the obvious multiple-champ contenders miss the mark – though kudos to Prost for winning at least two Grands Prix in 11 out of 13 career campaigns. Can anyone think of another driver/drivers to manage this? Please do say if so, I’d love to know!

12
Leave a Reply

avatar
 
Photo and Image Files
 
 
 
Audio and Video Files
 
 
 
Other File Types
 
 
 
6 Comment threads
6 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
9 Comment authors
AntioBobF1SommelierStevenF1 Kittehbigtheo Recent comment authors

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Nathhulal
Guest
Nathhulal

Based on the title I thought we were talking about big news from Nicole Scherzinger. Two angel babies under the umbrella sponsored by Rihanna on the way.

Fumbles
Guest
Fumbles

Question: How many drivers other than Lewis Hamilton have been in a car capable of winning races their entire career?

mark h
Guest
mark h

Ah but I would have preferred the answer!

You’re right of course, but that doesn’t alter the statistic. I’d argue one – Prost (debut in McLaren, factory Renaults, then back to McLaren, Ferrari, Williams Renault)… Senna had just one year in non-winning machinery.

Steven
Guest
Steven

The 2009 McLaren was NOT capable of winning races untill the end of the year. The car was only good for 13th place at the British GP. I think a lot of Lewis detractors conviniently forget about that season, how he stuck with the team untill they figured out the car, and when they did he responded with wins. McLaren stuck with him last year while he was going through his “thing”, yet when he responded this year they let him down, race after race. So, he hasnt had a car capable of winning rces his whole career.

Fumbles
Guest
Fumbles

Do not forget yourself that McLaren were openly endorsing Hamilton above Kovalainen, bringing him the great updates for each race. That’s why Kovalainen was off the pace and was openly criticising McLaren for claiming they were being equal when in fact the updates were being piled on Hamilton.
http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2009/10/31/kovalainen-angry-with-hamilton-favoritism.html

Hamilton has had a LOT of support during his career and that’s why he’ll do his best not to leave McLaren

Steven
Guest
Steven

Heiki is the one that qualified 13th, Lewis was 19th at the British GP. Besides, what does that have to do with Lewis having(or not having) a car good enough to win races? It took the team until the end of the season to deiver a winning car, regardeless of who was getting the updates.

F1Sommelier
Guest
F1Sommelier

Be careful Fumbles, if you keep making accurate comments this, you are going to be discarded as a “hater”. Hamilton is a hell of a driver, but from the end of the 2007 season on, you always got the feeling that Ron Dennis was making sure that Hamilton’s car was faster than his teammate’s
“We are racing Alonso”
Ron Dennis 2007

bigtheo
Guest
bigtheo

I’ll bet no other driver was given the best car his first year and stuck with a really competitive team the entire time. The last time Mclaren didn’t win a race was 2006.
but then again most other drivers know a much easier truth:
Red means stop.

F1 Kitteh
Guest
F1 Kitteh

The only problem is he went backwards in every race so far, except the one he started last, so they have to let him start 1 lap ahead to make it happen. I wonder if Mclaren is focusing on qualy too much at the expense of race pace.

AntioBob
Guest
AntioBob

The weather again will play a factor in compressing set-up/practice time. In the end we’re likely to have another surprise. Heraclitus loves F1.

AntioBob
Guest
AntioBob

…but I’d put money on Lewis if I was forced to bet (i.e., asked to make a rational prediction).