Vettel no fan of reverse grids

3

The Italian Grand Prix offered F1 fans an exciting result with Pierre Gasly winning in his Alpha Tauri. The team hadn’t won a race since the Italian Grand Prix in 2008. It also renewed a full-throated endorsement of the revers-grid concept from Sky Sports F1’s broadcast team as well as F1’s sporting director, Ross Brawn.

I’ve been relatively quiet about this concept since it’s inception because it doesn’t matter what I think about but be that as it may, I am not a fan of the concept. Today, it is clear that Sebastian Vettel isn’t either and here’s why.

“I think it’s completely wrong,” said Vettel.

“Obviously it’s a testimony that if you are pushing in that direction that you have failed to come up with regulations and tools that bring the field more together, and make racing better on track.

“As a reminder, we had new front wing regulations which cost everybody a fortune, but ultimately hasn’t changed much in terms of racing.

“I think it would be wrong.”

It’s balancing act and argument that the teams have been winning for years. The black art of aerodynamics is a least-cost solution to more speed and while I understand that, it will take a bold FIA decision to change the aero regulations for better racing. That’s much easier said than done.

We do have new regulations coming but as Sebastian says, they need to solve for the issue and not just mask it or kick it down the road.

“The hopes are on 2022, I guess, for the regulation changes,” he added.

“But I think we need to fix that and address the main points, rather than try to play the lottery.

“I think it’s just against the element of sport and competition, so as a competitor, I think as much as I don’t like other people to win, I have to accept if other people win, or do a better job.

“Therefore I think it would be wrong in the name of sport to try and mix things up that way.”

Formula One needs to get away from solving their ills “using this one weird trick” and get back to a comprehensive regulation set that mitigates the designs that stall the trailing cars. IF the cars are slower overall, that’s ok because the racing would be better.

That’s not a popular notion give Brawn’s desire to consider reverse grids. It’s not popular given Sky Sports and their energetic endorsement but I’d argue these are short-term gains when what F1 needs is long-term solutions.

5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Xean Drury

Not that I’m a fan of these shenanigans anyhow, but even more interesting is if odd qualifiers start as is on grid, and even qualifiers reverse on the grid. Then they still have the push in quali to get pole and there’s still be race chaos. Regardless all gimmicks are dumb. Want better racing? Stop changing the rules and let the cars develop closeness.

Robert Dompe

If is ain’t broke, don’t fix it!

sidewayskid

They are consistent in the movement toward increasing the audience. Marketing, protests and
“Statements” are now most important. Integrity of the race is now an after thought. Soon F-1 will be welcomed in to the world of , “every one gets a trophy”. Then they can take a knee before lining up
backwards. The next USGP can have Lewis hang out with Kaepernick. Let’s show them!
Arm raised high with thumb raised to the sky….
Chant….. “F-1 racing matters”. Sponsors?